Large Round Influential Objects

D.C. area space policy student note: How can you adapt the current planet definition criteria (under consideration) to also define what a politician is?

Planet determination criteria:

(a) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid-body forces so that it assumes hydrostatic-equilibrium (nearly round shape), and

(b) is the dominant object in its local population zone, and

(c) is in orbit around the Sun, and possibly

(d) has a "substantial" atmosphere (defined by having weather, complex surface processes, and possibly could possess life).

Adapted to politicians:


(a) has sufficient fundraising and mass to overcome the outside forces of special interests, usually requiring fund-raising meals (leading to a nearly round shape), and

(b) is the dominant object in its local population zone, and

(c) can talk/orbit in circles at a safe distance around the most massive/important topics without being drawn in or pulled apart, and possibly

(d) has a "substantial" atmosphere (defined by generating hot air, complex committee processes, and possibly could possess life).

  • submit to reddit


Loading




Join our mailing list




Commercialization: Monthly Archives

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on August 23, 2006 2:18 AM.

Astronaut Office Changes was the previous entry in this blog.

NAC Resignation Update is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.