Why There Won't Be A Propulsion De-Orbit Module For Hubble (it is "Idiotic")

Editor's note: According to Mike Griffin, speaking at the 31 October HST SM announcement: "I was the one who took the deorbit module off of this mission because I thought it was idiotic."

Earlier post: NASA Program management Council Meeting Minutes and Actions Date: July 28,2005: Second Item of Business: Hubble Space Telescope (HST) - Decay Profile and Propulsion De-Orbit Module (PDM) Use

At the request of the Administrator two presentations on the next Hubble servicing mission, as it relates to orbit decay and the need for a Propulsion De-Orbit Module (PDM), were given, one by the Program Office and one by PA&E. Based on these presentations, a decision on the need for the de-orbit module was made.

Description: A 4th Shuttle servicing mission (SM-4) for Hubble is being planned and part of the decision process is whether or not to include a de-orbit propulsion module as part of SM- 4. Both GSFC and PA&E presented analyses indicating that Hubble would "fly over" solar cycle 24 and thus there was a low probability of a Hubble reentry before - 2021. Given this, the agency would have time to consider use emerging technologies to achieve a controlled de-orbit when deemed necessary.

Action Taken: Per NASA Administrator, a PDM will not be included as part of SM-4.

Deadline Given: Not Applicable

  • submit to reddit


Loading




Join our mailing list




Commercialization: Monthly Archives

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on October 31, 2006 11:00 AM.

Griffin Approves Hubble Servicing Mission (No Surprise) was the previous entry in this blog.

Space Science Cut Update is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.