Why A Lot Of People Have A Problem Believing NASA

A space dilemma: extend missions or start afresh?, Nature

"Possible extensions are not mentioned in the initial mission planning stages, so designing missions to last longer than planned is an easy way for mission scientists to buy into future budgets. There's also the public-relations value in terms of public image, it is better to say a mission will last for five years and then extend its life, than to say it will last for ten years and lose it after nine. The latter scenario would be seen as a failure, says Lori Garver, a former NASA associate administrator. She sees no problem with deliberately underestimating the life of a spacecraft. By the time a mission is ready to be extended, the big pots of money have already been spent on it, she says."

  • submit to reddit


Support SpaceRef, NASA Watch and the Astrobiology Web on Patreon.

Join our mailing list

Commercialization: Monthly Archives

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on November 29, 2006 9:34 PM.

Errors in Investigation of NASA IG Surface was the previous entry in this blog.

Problems With ISS Reboost is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.