David Leckrone's Premature Judgement of ISS

Space station: Boon or boondoggle?, Discovery

"I hope the space station becomes extraordinarily, scientifically productive, but it is not today," said David Leckrone, the senior scientist for the Hubble Space Telescope, one of the agency's most successful and well-regarded programs. Uhran said it is too early in the station program to gauge its success on scientific output, which so far has been meager. The agency's Web site lists 172 station-related research papers -- many of which were not published in peer-reviewed journals. References to Hubble-related published science results, in contrast, number more than 3,500. "Judging the station at this time on its scientific output is a red herring," said John Logdon, a space policy analyst with George Washington University. "It's just getting started."

Keith's note: Hmmm, I wonder how much of Hubble's planned research (all of those published papers) got done before its manufacturing flaw (one that no one at STScI caught) was fixed - and after it was fixed (by humans) and was fully operational. ISS is just starting to flex its solar-powered wings. Stay tuned.

  • submit to reddit


Join our mailing list

Commercialization: Monthly Archives

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on May 28, 2009 4:14 PM.

Augustine Panel Members Identified was the previous entry in this blog.

Taking Care of the GAP, Russian Style is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.