Flying Air NASA

Conflict of interest? Congresswoman staunchly backs Constellation -- and is wed to astronaut, Orlando Sentinel

"On Memorial Day weekend in 2007, Kelly flew to Indiana to watch the Indy 500 with Giffords, his then-fiancée. Kelly listed the purpose of the trip as "Space Flight Readiness Training." NASA later said the flight may have violated the agency rules requiring astronauts "to avoid any appearance of inappropriate use of NASA T-38's" when logging their required monthly flight hours. The trip cost taxpayers almost $9,000."

Closing memo/final report/transmittal memo for several National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigations , Government Attic

"2. 0-KE.07.0167-S, March 11, 2008, Possible Misuse of NASA Aircrafts/Lisa Nowak"

On May 7, 2007, Raymond Sander, Johnson Space Center, presented the following scenario to Michael Griffin, NASA Administrator, at an ongoing "Ask the Administrator" meeting: "If 1, as a NASA employee in good standing get involved in some emotional, non lethal altercation and arrested by law enforcements agents in Florida, will NASA quickly dispatch my supervisor in a Government T-38 or equivalent, to represent NASA and assess the matter?" The Administrator responded to this question by answering "No."

Keith's note: I find it somewhat annoying that JSC often complains that there is not enough travel money for astronaut appearances and yet astronauts can fly T-38's almost any where they want to since the T-38 air time counts against their flight proficiency. That said, based on my experience, such questionable T-38 usage is the exception - not the rule. But it still happens.


Advertise Here

2 Comments

| Leave a comment

So is the only reason not to fly to Indianapolis to see the Indy 500 and to count towards required flight time in the process because it might look bad? It might not actually use any resources inappropriately. The race is on an extended weekend. I don't know about other logistical details like airport usage, refueling. Did it actually cost taxpayers $9,000 more than it would have if the flying was somewhere else? They should have been a little more clear.

Heck, maybe they should be NASA representatives there and do the "Start your engines" call or whatever.

I can't comment on the rest of the article.

I was thinking similarly, but leaning to a different conclusion. It sounds like NASA allows 2 hours of level flight at 40,000 ft to count toward flight proficiency requirements. That is, NASA requires the astronaut to spend that $9000 _somehow_, with details left up to the astronaut.

If they had asked me, and I were feeling Scroogey, I'd specify what kind of flying they need for compliance. For example, perhaps STS commanders and pilots (but not specialists) would have requirements to practice so many landings per month; but hours of level flight wouldn't count, and must be justified separately.

Leave a comment



Monthly Archives

Mortgage Lead

online bingo latest online bingo game reviews, bonuses and bingo news

Play online bingo at the top bingo sites.

Interested in Space Travel, try the next best thing, name your own star.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on December 21, 2009 9:37 AM.

Wall Street Journal on Commercial Space and Obama was the previous entry in this blog.

Jumping The Gun is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



- RADWIN's broadband access enabels cellular carriers to connect users everywhere.

- Looking for great prices on Burton Snowboards? Visit PortersTahoe.com

-