Congressional Hearing on Commercial Space Transportation

Prepared Statements

George C. Nield
Gerald Dillingham
J.P. Stevens
Jeff Greason
James A. Testwuide

Hearing Subject matter Summary

Commercial Space Transportation: Development of the Commercial Space Launch Industry Presents Safety Oversight Challenges for FAA and Raises Issues Affecting Federal Roles, GAO

"In overseeing the commercial space launch industry, including the safety of space tourism, FAA faces several challenges. These include maintaining a sufficient number of staff with the necessary expertise to oversee the safety of launches and spaceport operations; determining whether FAA's current safety regulations are appropriate for all types of commercial space vehicles, operations, and launch sites; developing information to help FAA decide when to regulate crew and passenger safety after 2012; and continuing to avoid conflicts between FAA's regulatory and promotional roles."


Advertise Here

5 Comments

| Leave a comment

Dangnabit. The link on the committee web site for Greason's testimony gives you Nield's testimony instead. The rest of the links work (inlcuding Nield's).

Hello,

there is something more we should have learned from the past. The money to do manned space flight comes from the taxpayer. Nevertheless building a new launcher is not a matter of a democratic majority. This does not work. Two percent of payload is too small to allow everyone’s opinion. There will never be a real good space transportation system continuing like this. No idea how to solve this contradiction. But it is necessary to look for! If you want a car to win a race, you will not look for a democratic round to discuss it, you will look for professionals. You will look for someone to handle the system and not only the components.

Its interesting that when Jeff Greason's testimony is selected I get Dr Nield's testimony instead. I hate to be picky but why don't the folks who put this information
up take it more seriously. Perhaps the democratic majority does not work for web pages either.

Not sure what you mean by "Two percent of payload is too small to allow everyone’s opinion." As far as I can tell that was the focus of your remarks, so I may be missing the point.

About the money coming from government-- that's true unless there's an immediate and obvious market, such as with automobiles, transistors, lasers, and computer chips. We can also compare with space remote sensing, which was initially funded exclusively by the government (though often built by industry), but now can be supported by purely commercial ventures with private capital.

Similarly, aviation in its early years was heavily supported by government war expenditures. After a decade or two, private ventures in aviation became feasible also, and now I think civilian aircraft outnumber government owned aircraft (in number, perhaps not in $$).

Likewise, the advance toward space is funded by the government when it's in the country's strategic interest but is not yet commercially viable. When/if a commercial ticket to orbit costs less than my house, it will become viable as a business, but until then look to government to continue as a leading customer for private spaceflight providers.

They fixed the Greason link.

Leave a comment



Monthly Archives

Mortgage Lead

online bingo latest online bingo game reviews, bonuses and bingo news

Play online bingo at the top bingo sites.

Interested in Space Travel, try the next best thing, name your own star.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on December 2, 2009 3:15 PM.

Hanley Changes His Story On Ares 1 Safety - Again was the previous entry in this blog.

Congressional Hearing on Safety is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



- RADWIN's broadband access enabels cellular carriers to connect users everywhere.

- Looking for great prices on Burton Snowboards? Visit PortersTahoe.com

-