Wall Street Journal on Commercial Space and Obama

New Course for Space Exploration Promotes Private Firms, WS Journal

"The Obama administration appears set to chart a new course for U.S. space exploration by promoting the use of private companies to ferry astronauts into orbit, according to people familiar with the matter. The controversial plan would mark a trailblazing departure for the nation's space program by allowing a group of closely held start-up companies, for the first time, to compete for a central role in an arena previously dominated by much larger, publicly traded contractors with long track records working for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration."


Advertise Here

4 Comments

| Leave a comment

What NASA needs to do is to jointly develop a simple disposable-- shuttle derived SSTO booster-- with the Air Force and private industry that can safely transport an Orion or a manned winged X-37-like vehicle to LEO. Such a vehicle could be the space equivalent of the old DC-3 aircraft that revolutionized the airline industry back in the 1930s and 1940s.

And such a vehicle would be attractive for NASA, the Air Force, and most importantly, private industry, for launching humans,cargo,and satellites safely and routinely into orbit either from land or via a Sea Launch configuration.

Marcel F. Williams


The USAF and Big Aerospace already did much of what you suggest in developing the 2 EELV vehicles. These are now massively underutilized. Why not use what is available now instead of pining for something new?

NASA has repeatedly shown they are incapable of developing new launch vehicles. Giving them a new launcher mandate will result in the same thing we have seen from NASP and SEI through VentureStar to Ares - a giant helping of fail and huge 'kitchen sink' budget busters.

"What NASA needs to do is to jointly develop a simple disposable..."

NASA doesn't necessarily need to pick tech favorites or "national" boosters. Over at the New York Times, Ed Lu pushes the "supply side" approach of NASA driving demanding for launch services.

With that approach, its may-the-best-rocket-win, as opposed to rallying around a national space transportation system.

"The USAF and Big Aerospace already did much of what you suggest in developing the 2 EELV vehicles."

I agree that the Air Force attempted to do so just as NASA attempted to do so when they originally developed the space shuttle. There was a lot of interest initially by private industry about buying their own space shuttles. But both vehicle configurations are far too complex and too expensive for commercial use.

"NASA doesn't necessarily need to pick tech favorites or "national" boosters."

I also agree. But but there's been nothing stopping private international industries and their investors from around the world from developing their own manned space craft configurations! The struggling Sea Launch company is a good example of what believe will eventually be a successful private venture in the long run.

But NASA and the Air Force along with US private contractors are experts at developing new rocket technology for manned space travel. And they're also experts at what works and what doesn't work-- through their own successes, failures, and mistakes! That's why I believe that NASA and the Air Force need to need to develop a simple shuttle derived (Jupiter lite) single stage to orbit rocket that would be useful for NASA, the Air Force and for private commercial industry.

But if private international corporations and their investors think they can build a cheaper and safer manned space craft than NASA and there is a private market out there for their manned space flight plans that wouldn't require tax payer dollars in order to keep it alive, then they should do it!

But so far, over the past 50 years since the dawn of space travel, private industry's attempt to create a viable commercial manned space program-- on the cheap- hasn't worked. Sometimes you have to spend money in order to make money! But right now, private industry is just not spending enough money on developing their own manned space flight programs in order to reach their goals.

Marcel F. Williams

Leave a comment



Monthly Archives

Mortgage Lead

online bingo latest online bingo game reviews, bonuses and bingo news

Play online bingo at the top bingo sites.

Interested in Space Travel, try the next best thing, name your own star.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on December 21, 2009 12:46 AM.

Too Close to NASA For Comfort? was the previous entry in this blog.

Flying Air NASA is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



- RADWIN's broadband access enabels cellular carriers to connect users everywhere.

- Looking for great prices on Burton Snowboards? Visit PortersTahoe.com

-