RSS Feed
Twitter
13 Comments
Control Spending Now Act: Sacrificing NASA's Long-Term Effectiveness for Political Expediency, Ian Malone for NASA Watch
As the nation looks for ways to cut out-of-control spending, one senator in particular has proposed a measure that will have a negative impact on the future of manned spaceflight. Senator Russ Feingold, (D-Wis.), has proposed the Control Spending Now Act which would cause the plans to return astronauts to the moon to be delayed by some five years.
Feingold has stated that given the current fiscal crisis that it would be fiscally irresponsible to return astronauts to the moon. He has also stated that the astronauts would be endangered by what he called, "unnecessary risk." Feingold is a member of the Senate Budget Committee.
Utilizing the Augustine Commission's report as part of his rationale as well as the recent displays by the American public of their displeasure at the amount of spending that has happened in the past year; Feingold entered the act to cut the current U.S. deficit, which stands at $1.42 trillion.
Ironically, while Feingold takes issue with NASA returning to the job of exploration, he has little issue with supporting Health Care Reform. Although estimates for the current Health Care Reform Bill vary between $1 trillion, $905 and $849 billion dollars - the cost is substantial and will encompass one-sixth of the American economy. NASA's budget by comparison, at its height during the Apollo program was $35 billion. NASA's budget for the 2010 fiscal year is currently estimated at $18 billion dollars.
The estimated savings of delaying the lunar missions is some $24.7 billion. However, the real expense could actually be in delaying the lunar program. By reigning in NASA's efforts, Feingold would in fact be giving a green light for other nations to take the lead. China, Europe, Russia and India are moving ahead with their lunar ambitions despite economic concerns.
The plans of these countries appear more pragmatic than the Apollo Program, based less on prestige and science and more on the future vitality of their respective peoples. With the recent discovery of caches of water on the moon as well as the deposits of metals, minerals and other resources to be found in the lunar regolith, the moon is a tempting target for exploration and possible exploitation. Senator Feingold's attempts to delay NASA's lunar resurgence may allow these others nation's aspirations to reach fruition at the expense of his own constituents.
Feingold’s bill could save us $2.5 billion a year for 10 years. Wow! Last years Federal budget was $3.1 trillion, more than a 1000 times that amount. If Feingold is really serious about reducing Federal spending then reforming wasteful Federal health care expenditures could save us over $200 billion a year.
http://newpapyrusmagazine.blogspot.com/2001/11/how-real-public-option-could.html
Finally getting out of Iraq could save us another $100 billion a year and funding a million man Afghan army and police force to replace nearly 70,000 US troops in Afghanistan would save us at least $50 billion a year since Afghan soldiers salaries are less than $2000 a year. So that’s $350 billion in annual savings compared to $2.5 billion.
Of course, since the NASA budget actually generates more money than it consumes, Feingold’s bill would be costing the US both money and jobs!
http://thespaceadvocate.blogspot.com/2009/12/you-want-economic-impact-you-cant.html