Using ISS: Old Excuses and New Excuses

Doubts linger about space station's science potential, Orlando Sentinel

"It's the tip of the iceberg," said Marybeth Edeen, NASA manager of the station's national laboratory. The inability to completely fill NASA's science racks, she said, is simply one of priorities. Up until now, NASA has been more focused on building the station. Indeed, the station crew -- which expanded from three to six members in 2009 -- now spends about 50 hours a week on science, as opposed to just three hours a week in 2008. "Our goal is to get the racks fully utilized," she said. To help do that, NASA hired a nonprofit group last summer called the Center for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS) to manage the national lab and find new experiments.

Keith's note: NASA has had well over a decade to figure out how to fully utilize the ISS. And yet they haven't done so. The ISS was declared "complete" some time ago. So ... what is the hold up?

  • submit to reddit


Humans to Mars Summit 2019
The Robert H. Goddard Memorial Symposium
Military Space Situational Awareness April 1 - April 2, 2019, London, UK
Aster Labs - CubeSats

Join our mailing list

Commercialization: Monthly Archives

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on April 15, 2012 1:47 PM.

CASIS Finally Does Something Smart was the previous entry in this blog.

NASA's Take On Certifying Commercial Crew Carriers is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.