This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Uncategorized

GRC Procurement: Time Machine Required To Bid

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
October 25, 2012
Filed under ,

Keith’s 25 October note: NASA GRC put out this small business set aside solicitation “Alarm Philosophy Development Workshop” on 25 October 2012. Responses are due a mere 24 hours later on 26 October 2012. The solicitation states “This notice is being issued as a Request for Quotations (RFQ) for an Alarm Philosophy Development Workshop for twenty-five (25) people from November 5, 2012, through November 9, 2012.” GRC says “all responsible sources may submit an offer which shall be considered by the agency” and “Selection and award will be made to that offeror whose offer will be most advantageous to the Government, with consideration given to the factors of proposed technical merit, price, and past performance.”
But nowhere is the “Alarm Philosophy Development Workshop” even described such that someone can submit a bid – assuming that they can even pull one together with only 24 hours notice. Curiously, this formal NASA procurment notice, issued on 25 October 2012, also states “All contractual and technical questions must be in writing (e-mail or fax) to … not later than close of business Wednesday, October 24, 2012.” In other words you need a time machine so as to be able to submit comments required – a day before this notice was even released – assuming that you know enough to submit anything in the first place.
Keith’s 26 October update: Someone must read NASAWatch. This mod was just posted today. A time machine is no longer needed. “You are notified that the following changes are made: Date for receipt of technical/contractual questions is close of business October 29, 2012. Date for receipt of quotations is close of business October 31, 2012. The due date for responses is extended to close of business October 31, 2012.” This mod adds a statement of work that explains what the government will actually spend your money on. Guess what: its all about “alarms”. I sent email inquires to the individuals listed on the original notice but they never responded. They never do.

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

4 responses to “GRC Procurement: Time Machine Required To Bid”

  1. Nassau Goi says:
    0
    0

    “ALARM PHILOSOPHY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP”

    Looks to be a surge of cash for someone/somegroup networked well.

  2. Vladislaw says:
    0
    0

    I don’t know Keith .. has anyone built the flux capacitor yet?  … smiles

    Does NASA every respond when you point up the nutty stuff like this? Ever a thank you?

  3. John_AnotherContractor says:
    0
    0

    Nothing new here. As for my guess, somebody went to all the trouble of setting this up with company X, sent out invites, etc. then was notified that this had to go out for bid, rather than the funding mechanism they were planning on. They threw this mess together hastily, even forgetting a statement of work, to satisfy legal requirements. Bid if you like, but the winner has already been chosen. Of course, everyone knows not to bother to bid on these, and if you look into it you will usually find one qualified bid. Typically the companies that put on the workshops have a flat rate they are charging so NASA isn’t getting gouged by this.

    Now, if the attendees bring away anything useful and applicable to NASA is another matter entirely. Usually the way to tell is by the number of people involved in setting it up. The less involved, the greater chance of “why are we here?” as they also bypassed feedback.