This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Congress

Partisan Politics and Scientific Peer Review

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
May 10, 2013
Filed under , ,

AIP FYI: Eighteen Former NSF Assistant Directors Criticize House Science Committee Bill and Inquiry
“The draft bill mandates a certification process for NSF awards that frankly requires the Director to accurately predict the future. The history of scientific discovery suggests this is just not feasible and we, as former federal science and technology executives, would suggest many basic research projects in every field supported by the NSF would likely not qualify for certification under this bill. This would be shortsighted, in our opinion since some of our greatest discoveries and innovations were unexpectedly born from basic research.”
Injecting Partisan Politics into Scientific Peer Review, earlier post

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

2 responses to “Partisan Politics and Scientific Peer Review”

  1. hikingmike says:
    0
    0

    Hard to ignore that.

  2. Steve Whitfield says:
    0
    0

    We, your glorious leaders, will mandate your results and you shall predict the future. This sounds like the USSR in the 1960’s, an enormous step backwards for US science, technology and politics.