This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Budget

"Deficit Hawks" in OMB to Blame for Planetary Science Budget Woes Says Rep. Schiff

By Marc Boucher
NASA Watch
August 8, 2013
Filed under

At anniversary of Curiosity landing, recommit to planetary science: Adam Schiff (D-CA), Op-Ed Los Angeles Daily News
One might think that the latest round of draconian cuts are driven by reductions to the federal budget — and, in turn, to NASA’s budget — necessary to reduce our debt and deficit. But that isn’t the case. To the president’s credit, NASA’s overall budget hasn’t been targeted and remains largely flat, a signal achievement when domestic discretionary spending is at its lowest levels since the Eisenhower Administration. Instead, time and again, deficit hawks in the Office of Management and Budget have targeted specific parts of the NASA portfolio for disproportionate cuts, and none more so than arguably the most successful of all NASA’s recent achievements — planetary science.
And for whatever reason, the “crown jewel” of the planetary science program, Mars, is in the crosshairs and the men and women of JPL know it. Last year, as a way to highlight the budget cuts, some workers hosted a bake sale, and in an effort to cut back non-essential programs and activities in the wake of sequestration, popular outreach programs like the JPL’s annual open house have been cancelled, as have visits to classrooms and other educational activities.

SpaceRef co-founder, entrepreneur, writer, podcaster, nature lover and deep thinker.

3 responses to “"Deficit Hawks" in OMB to Blame for Planetary Science Budget Woes Says Rep. Schiff”

  1. SomeGuy42 says:
    0
    0

    Link is broken, directs you here instead.

  2. dogstar29 says:
    0
    0

    NASA’s budget has been pretty flat, and even Schiff doesn’t call for higher taxes. Tech spinoff and keeping JPL scientists from going to other countries (China?) are make work arguments. Schiff needs to state the obvious; NASA itself has some very expensive programs and needs to set some priorities. With SLS/Orion taking close to half the total budget and JWST a large share of the science budget something has to go. If planetary science is important its advocates need to stand up and say what it is more important than.