This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Exploration

NASA Future In-Space Operations: Supersynchronous Earth Orbits for Lunar Missions

By Marc Boucher
NASA Watch
December 22, 2016
Filed under ,

NASA Future In-Space Operations: MOBIUS – Supersynchronous Earth Orbits for Lunar Missions

Now available is the November 16, 2016 NASA Future In-Space Operations (FISO) telecon material. The speaker was Madhu Thangavelu (USC) who presented “MOBIUS – Supersynchronous Earth Orbits for Lunar Missions.”
Note: The audio file and presentation are online and available to download.

SpaceRef co-founder, entrepreneur, writer, podcaster, nature lover and deep thinker.

6 responses to “NASA Future In-Space Operations: Supersynchronous Earth Orbits for Lunar Missions”

  1. Eric Hartwell says:
    0
    0

    It’s kind of sad to see the Apollo spacecraft in that picture. NASA really likes that design, but it’s not 1961 any more. And, if Apollo’s CSM engine bell was way oversized since it was designed to lift the CSM off the Moon, what’s the excuse for this one?

    • Jeff2Space says:
      0
      0

      <sarcasm>
      That’s clearly not Apollo, look at the solar panels.
      </sarcasm>

    • BryceW says:
      0
      0

      The large bell is to eke out every erg of rocket energy in a vacuum. In air pressure, the pressure keeps the flame from spreading so much and so the bell is smaller. The CSM was never landed on or taken off from the Moon. And, that’s not Apollo, but the very similar modern design being built these days. Though I agree with the sentiment “it’s not 1961 any more.”

  2. Granit says:
    0
    0

    Worse yet is to see a chemical stage rather than a solar electric propulsion stage depicted.

    • Scott Hopkins says:
      0
      0

      The dreamer in me still wants to see the orbiter stage look something like the nautilus-x design…

    • fcrary says:
      0
      0

      I’m not excited about the long trip time through the radiation belts. For cargo, that’s not a problem. For people, it’s a real concern.