This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Commercialization

The Exciting NASA Economic Impact Report That No One Seems To Care About (UPDATE)

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
September 28, 2020
Filed under ,
The Exciting NASA Economic Impact Report That No One Seems To Care About (UPDATE)

Economic development projects to bring 510 new jobs to Huntsville area, Made in Alabama (Alabama Department of Commerce)
“The Huntsville/Madison County Chamber today announced that new economic development projects will bring 510 new jobs and more than $71 million in investment to the community.”
Keith’s 27 Sep 10:54 am EDT note: This release was issued on 25 September 2020 – the same day as the NASA economic Report came out. The Made in Alabama (Alabama Department of Commerce) website makes no mention of the NASA Economic Impact report. NASA HQ makes no mention of this news from Alabama. NASA Marshall makes no mention of this local economic news or the NASA economic report on their website but their twitter account retweeted @JimBridenstine’s tweet – once.
NASA’s Impact on Economy Is No Secret to Space Coast, MyNews13
“In Florida, NASA employs 33,000 workers and makes a $5.9 billion impact on the Space Coast, according to Space Florida’s Dale Ketcham. Planned missions to return to the moon and to go to Mars for the first time are responsible for a lot of that impact, he said.”
There is no mention of this report (or a link to it) on the Space Florida website but they are responding to media requests. There is no mention on the NASA Kennedy website but they did retweet @JimBridensine’s tweet – once. No mention is made on the Florida Governor’s website or the Department of Economic Opportunity. Rep. Bill Posey has posted nothing on his website or his Twitter account. Sen. Rick Scott makes no mention on his website or Twitter account. Sen. Marco Rubio has nothing on his website but he does make mention on his Twitter account. Given the immense amount of money NASA has sent to Florida over the past half century you’d think that the folks there would be a little more interested in spreading the good news – especially when the economy is in such dire shape. Its baffling that NASA Kennedy is not making more of this good news.
Oddly, while Johnson Space Center makes no mention of this NASA economic impact report on their homepage, they do have an old link prominently featuring their own report: “Texas Comptroller Releases NASA Economic Impact Report“. I mentioned this report back in September 2019 when JSC did a stealth launch of their own:
“Look at this Texas portion (larger image) of the list of companies that are suppliers to SLS/Orion/Artemis: “2019 Deep Space Exploration Systems Supplier Locations”. These 182 companies are located all over Texas. I’ll be willing to bet that nearly all of these companies have no idea that there is a NASA website that lists all of the small business that work on this project. The Texas Comptroller seems not to know about it. JSC does not mention it either. Why go through the time and expense of collecting this information if no one is told that it exists?”
While JSC still features this old economic news from a year ago on their website, JSC makes no mention of the new report – but they did retweet Jim Bridenstine’s tweet – once.
There is no mention on the NASA Ames website; none at NASA Armstrong’s website; nor any mention at NASA JPL’s website – this despite the fact that the report cites California having “69,725 jobs in the California economy were supported by NASA activities in Fiscal Year 2019” and that “The total income impact of NASA in California was $6.3 billion in Fiscal Year 2019.”
Keith’s 28 Sep 12:21 pm EDT update: NASA Langley just issued this press release today at 12:13 pm EDT. NASA’s Moon to Mars Economic Impact Study Shows Significant Benefit for Virginia – but no mention on their homepage.
No mention is made by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology or the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation (Jim Bridenstine will be testifying there on Wednesday – maybe he will mention the report).
No mention of the NASA report is made at the Aerospace Industries Association, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, the Space Foundation, the Commercial Spaceflight Federation, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce – or the National Space Council. To their credit, the Coalition for Deep Space Exploration does make brief mention on their website and links to the NASA report. And of course none of the space advocacy groups have bothered to say anything.
I could go on and research the PR given to this report for all 50 states. A simple Google news search will show how underwhelming the response has been. Let me be clear: this report is overflowing with great news for NASA and hundreds of communities across the nation. I hope NASA publishes more things like this since they have only scratched the surface of what NASA provides to this nation. America needs good news right now. The inspirational aspect of what NASA does as part of this good news is an added bonus in these dark times. But it is downright depressing to see NASA drop the ball when it comes to promoting its own good news – once again.
What happend to all of that presidential “Make Space Great Again” hoopla? Or was that just for campaign ads?
NASA’s Economic Impact Study Misses Much Of NASA’s Economic Impact, earlier post
NASA Economic Impact Report Released, earlier post
NASA Report Details How Agency Significantly Benefits US Economy, earlier post

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

8 responses to “The Exciting NASA Economic Impact Report That No One Seems To Care About (UPDATE)”

  1. Michael Spencer says:
    0
    0

    I’m by no means any sort of insider.

    Doesn’t everyone know that the Friday night drop (thanks, Keith) is thought to be some sort of ‘black hole’, and to some extent releasing anything Friday night is attempted stealth that sometimes works, sometimes does not work?

    I’ve read only Keith’s comments on the matter, figuring that if the report contained anything really damaging Keith would have kindly pointed it out.

    That not being the case, *why* was the Report buried? Wouldn’t NASA want to maximize whatever was to be gained? I am confused.

    • kcowing says:
      0
      0

      They released it at 7:00 am EDT on a Friday morning. So they had a day. One day. Before a weekend – which kills most mundane news stories. You’ll see some newsy things on Monday but they passed on a chance to get traction last week by announcing this on a Friday. Oh yes – the NASA Administrator was on the Hill testifying on Wednesday, They did not know on Wednesday that this was going to be released on Friday such that they could give a preview – or maybe plan its launch for a Senate hearing – a hearing about NASA’s budget i.e. how well it is doing and why it needs the resources that it is asking for?

      • Michael Spencer says:
        0
        0

        Thinking more about this, and looking over the full Report, I’d like to revise and extend my remarks? 🙂

        I do not know how Agencies keep legislators informed. I figured that NASA ‘staffers’ and legislative aides would be in some kind of continual square dance. I don’t know the role of a Report like this one, nor do I know if it is a large or small part of Agency efforts.

        I have assumed that each Agency sniffs around, protecting turf by peeing wherever necessary, and that this sort of thing has little actual value.

  2. Brian_M2525 says:
    0
    0

    So certain there was a CongressionalNASA budget hearing 2 days earlier I’d say they missed the appropriate date to release the report by about a week.

    • kcowing says:
      0
      0

      It is weird that they did not know on Wednesday last week that this big report was coming out. This suggests that NASA PAO has not in the loop and that there was no roll out plan.

      • Michael Spencer says:
        0
        0

        Or, that the ‘public’ rollout had little actual meaning, the data having been transmitted to legislators earlier?

  3. Donald Barker says:
    0
    0

    Either this whole thing is very telling about our societal desires and proprieties in general, which should drive attention to the topic, or it is just a big mistake. Given history I’m inclined to lean towards the former, which itself is a sad reflection and indictment of modern America.