This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Artemis

Has Anyone Seen Bill Nelson's NASA Budget Windfall?

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
September 6, 2021
Filed under , , , ,
Has Anyone Seen Bill Nelson's NASA Budget Windfall?

Draft House Infrastructure Bill Funds NASA and NOAA Space Programs But Not HLS, Space Policy Online
“NASA will get an extra $4.4 billion if Congress agrees with draft legislation proposed by the House committee that oversees the agency. While generous, it is far short of what NASA Administrator Bill Nelson is seeking and does not include any money for a second lunar lander for the Artemis program. The committee is also proposing over $4 billion for NOAA, including additional money for the space weather satellite program. Nelson is hoping Congress will add $15.7 billion to NASA’s coffers on top of the agency’s regular appropriations through President Biden’s effort to secure $4.5 trillion for the nation’s infrastructure.”
Bill Nelson Says He’s Discovered A New Pile Of Money For NASA, earlier post May 2021
“Nelson decided that the way for NASA to get out of the fiscal mess it is in is to do a Hail Mary pass and dive into the new TBD Jobs Bill that the Administration is formulating and grab some dollars. He said “You can put $5.4 Billion into the jobs bill for the HLS that would be at the end of the day producing jobs. Another $200 million could go into that bill for spacesuits.” He went on to say “We can also put $585 million on nuclear thermal propulsion.” Nelson then turned to another pot of forthcoming money – the multi-trillion dollar Infrastructure bill and said “Part of the jobs bill is infrastructure – there’s another $5.4 Billion. Look at NASA facilities in your state (congressman) – there is aging infrastructure.” Do the math. All told, it looks like he wants to raid the cookie jar for something like $10 – 11 billion. One would assume that OMB is on board with this plan.”
Keith’s note: I thought Senator Administrator Bill Nelson had this all figured out. Seriously, he would not have freelanced on his plan to get a NASA windfall without OMB approval, right? Meanwhile SLS is not going to launch until the middle of next year; there’s only money for one HLS contract (despite all of the lawsuit activity); and the money needed just to keep the status quo in place is simply not there. Does Bill Nelson have a Plan B? We’d all like to see it. Stay tuned.
Earlier SLS postings

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

6 responses to “Has Anyone Seen Bill Nelson's NASA Budget Windfall?”

  1. Terry Stetler says:
    0
    0

    One would think $0 Congressional funding for a second HLS lander should give the Claims Court pause about taking Blue seriously, but this is DC we’re talking about… ?‍♂️

  2. ed2291 says:
    0
    0

    This seems like just more of the same old nonsense that has kept humans from venturing past low earth orbit since 1973. In the meantime the FAA appears to be slow dragging on approving Starship and has not even opened a comment period for the environmental review.

  3. Johnhouboltsmyspiritanimal says:
    0
    0

    It is sad to see congress and nelson putting more money into buildings than actual exploration.

    • mfwright says:
      0
      0

      Elon Musk said in a recent interview with Everyday Astronaut the launch pad and factory [stage zero] is the most difficult to build, the rocket [stage one and up] is much easier. And NASA buildings are OLD, difficult to compete with new companies with new buildings when hiring young people.