This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Commercialization

Nanoracks Announces The Starlab Private Space Station

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
October 21, 2021
Filed under ,
Nanoracks Announces The Starlab Private Space Station

Nanoracks, Voyager Space, and Lockheed Martin Teaming to Develop Commercial Space Station, Nanoracks
“Nanoracks, in collaboration with Voyager Space and Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT], has formed a team to develop the first-ever free flying commercial space station. The space station, known as Starlab, will be a continuously crewed commercial platform, dedicated to conducting critical research, fostering industrial activity, and ensuring continued U.S. presence and leadership in low-Earth orbit. Starlab is expected to achieve initial operational capability by 2027.”

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

14 responses to “Nanoracks Announces The Starlab Private Space Station”

  1. Todd Austin says:
    0
    0

    The main structure appears to be inflatable. Is Bigelow involved in this at all? I don’t find mention of them at the Nanoracks web site.

    • Paul Gillett says:
      0
      0

      According to the news release, Lockheed Martin is responsible for the habitat.

      • Todd Austin says:
        0
        0

        Thanks, I see that now: “…a large inflatable habitat, designed and built by Lockheed Martin…”. It seems that Bigelow shuttered on the verge of the emergence of a market for their work. Perhaps LockMart has licensed or purchased their IP? https://news.lockheedmartin

        • Paul Gillett says:
          0
          0

          Interesting take.

          When I first took a quick look at the video, before reading the release; my first thought was the same as yours…Bigelow. It will be interesting to see how Lockheed’s habitat work evolves.

        • Terry Stetler says:
          0
          0

          I believe NASA released the TransHab patents to public domain ~2016.

          • Todd Austin says:
            0
            0

            Yup. With a number of years of experience with the tech and multiple inflatables in orbit, Bigelow could be several steps beyond the tech that NASA released on inflatables.

          • Terry Stetler says:
            0
            0

            The story isn’t just Bigelow. Many of their soft structure bits were made by Thin Red Line Aerospace in Chilliwack BC, Canada.

            http://www.thin-red-line.co

            Bigelow Aerospace inflatable habitat

            Genesis spacecraft flight hardware

            Thin Red Line developed and supplied 20 full-fidelity inflatable pressure shells of up to 320 cubic meter volume for Bigelow Aerospace. Thin Red Line designed, engineered and manufactured the pressure restraining hulls of Genesis 1 and 2 (launched 7/2006 and 6/2007 respectively), the first spacecraft on orbit successfully incorporating large volume, high-stress inflatable architecture.

        • Bill Housley says:
          0
          0

          I was unaware that Bigelow “shuttered”. I knew they were in mothballs waiting for things like Crew Dragon, but I hadn’t heard that they’d gone under.

          • Todd Austin says:
            0
            0

            With zero employees since March of 2020, it’s hard to see how they go forward from here. The claim was that they fired everyone due to the pandemic. Well, 98% of us have been back to work for a very long time now and Bigelow still has zero employees. The Nanoracks station would have been a perfect application of their tech and experience, yet they still have zero employees and LM is listed as the company building the inflatable hab. The wheels of private space station development are spinning right now. If Bigelow isn’t reanimated very soon, I would be surprised if they ever reappeared.

          • Bill Housley says:
            0
            0

            Bigelow Aerospace and their inflatable stations are joined at the hip to Boeing and CST-100…which still hasn’t flown (successfully).
            That might be the real reason why they’re still stuck. Let’s not totally write them off until July 2022 or so.

        • M Puckett says:
          0
          0

          More like hired their discarded employees.

    • M Puckett says:
      0
      0

      I suspect several former Bigelow engineers are involved.

  2. Bad Horse says:
    0
    0

    Build more and more of these. Sell them to other nations. Offer major tax credits for commercial operations (zero g commercial production – zero tax). Have the gov buy 1/2 the time and space on each station, then parse it out to US research. The more stations, the more crewed/cargo launches, the less expensive it will become over time. This can be the start of true commercial large scale operations.