Shuttle News: December 2009 Archives

How Quickly We Forget

Stage now set for grand human space flight plan, Opinion, Lou Friedman, Houston Chronicle

"We don't know yet what the Obama administration has in mind for NASA or how it is going to handle the issue of human space flight. We are sure it will not be canceled, but how will it be advanced? We see two distinct possibilities: a great one that would have us engage the world and several generations to take the next great leap, or a mundane one that would have us locked in Earth orbit with little purpose and a level of risk that exceeds its gain. The 1970s shuttle decision produced a great vehicle and a magnificent technological accomplishment, but ultimately a poor program with no destination and little purpose. We hope this type of decision will not be repeated, and believe that the stage has been set for something much grander."

Keith's 14 Dec note: Lou, in your haste to wrap your arms around the as-yet unreleased Obama space plan, you apparently haven't bothered to read up on the decades of human physiology expertise gained from these Space Shuttle (and shuttle-supported ISS) missions of "little purpose" or the immense experience gained in the assembly and operation of large complex spacecraft (the ISS was mostly carried into orbit by the Space Shuttle). Both of these things are needed in order for humans to go to Mars. So, do not be so quick to dismiss the value of the Space Shuttle program. Indeed, it may not be going away entirely (sidemount HLV).

"Flexible Path" means that we try many things Lou - not just the one particular destination that you are interested in (Mars).

Keith's 15 Dec update: I got a short email today from Lou Friedman: "Did you have a typo in this sentence "the decades of human physiology expertise gained from these Space Shuttle" Did you mean "the decades of human physiology expertise gained from these Soyuz and Mir?"

It would seem that Lou is utterly ignorant of the long list of research projects done aboard the Space Shuttle including multiple Spacelab flights, some of which were totally dedicated to human physiology and space life science. As for the quality of Soyuz and Mir research (before the U.S. got involved during shuttle flights, that is), Lou, go talk to a few space life science experts about that and then get back to me. You will find that the quality of that Soviet/Russian research to be somewhat "lacking" to put it kindly.

Also, I find it rather bizarre that Lou would characterize the value of the Space Shuttle as he has given that NASA's current Administrator put his life on the line 4 times to fly on it. I (guess) that Lou thinks that the risk that Bolden and his crewmates took was really done for "little purpose" as well.

Again, how quickly we forget. Indeed, as is the case in this instance, some people forget on purpose.

Space battle for the White House under way, Orlando Sentinel

"Ares I supporters have opposed the panel's findings, saying that Constellation and Ares I are better and safer than any commercial rocket. Until now, however, companies like Boeing have done most of their lobbying behind closed doors despite being urged by some lawmakers to take their cause public. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D- Arizona, the head of the House subcommittee with NASA oversight and the wife of NASA astronaut Mark Kelly, says she urged aerospace leaders to get their employees to write the President over the summer, but said only six letters were written. Boeing has the contract to build the upper stage of the Ares I rocket which it is developing with NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama."


Loading

 



Monthly Archives

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries in the Shuttle News category from December 2009.

Shuttle News: November 2009 is the previous archive.

Shuttle News: January 2010 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.