This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Astronomy

How NSF Is Walking Away From Iconic Radio Telescopes

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
October 19, 2016
Filed under ,
How NSF Is Walking Away From Iconic Radio Telescopes

Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Initiate Section 106 Consultation for Proposed Changes to Green Bank Observatory Operations, Green Bank, West Virginia and Notice of Public Scoping Meetings and Comment Period, NSF
“The NSF Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division of Astronomical Sciences, through a series of academic community-based reviews, has identified the need to divest several facilities from its portfolio. This would allow NSF to retain the balance of capabilities needed to deliver the best performance on emerging and key science technology of the present decade and beyond. In 2012, NSF’s Division of Astronomical Sciences’ (AST’s) portfolio review committee recommended divestment of the Green Bank Telescope (GBT) from the AST portfolio.”
Green Bank Observatory Inaugurated
“Formerly a cornerstone of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO), the Green Bank Observatory [https://greenbankobservatory.org] is now a fully-fledged, independent astronomical and educational facility of the National Science Foundation (NSF), operated under a cooperative agreement with Associated Universities, Inc. (AUI).”

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

2 responses to “How NSF Is Walking Away From Iconic Radio Telescopes”

  1. Michael Spencer says:
    0
    0

    A political shot across the bow.

  2. Daniel Woodard says:
    0
    0

    If Green Bank and Arecibo are still cost effective (and I believe they are) then it would be rational to fund them. This is an attempt (which may or may not succeed) to solicit philantropic and state educational funds for this. But we should campaign to increase NSF funding, as it is the most efficient funding mechanism.