This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
ISS News

NASA Talks In Glowing Terms About Centrifuge It Cancelled

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
September 15, 2015
Filed under , , ,

Keith’s note: JSC is webcasting part of their media event with some of the cast of The Martian (it was a last minute decision for JSC to put this on NASA TV BTW). In the movie there is artificial gravity on the ship that goes to/from Mars. The new ISS Program Manager Kirk Shireman spent a lot of time describing what the 2.5 meter Centrifuge Facility could/might provide in terms of supporting human missions to Mars. But Shireman neglected to mention that NASA traded the development of the Centrifuge Facility and Module in one of its bait and switch moves to Japan to offset some ISS costs and then eventually cancelled it outright in 2005. But NASA JSC clearly doesn’t want movie goers to know that NASA did dumb stuff like this.
Funny thing: back in the day (early 1990s) I was Payload Accommodations Manager for that the Space Station Freedom Program Office for the CF and CAM – and JSC fought that thing tooth and nail. Now they love it. Go figure.

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

13 responses to “NASA Talks In Glowing Terms About Centrifuge It Cancelled”

  1. Todd Austin says:
    0
    0

    If they really want to learn things about going to and living on Mars on ISS, they will have to launch CAM or its equivalent.

    Keith, what’s your sense – could the unit that’s sitting on display in Japan be used, or would they need to start over?

  2. Daniel Woodard says:
    0
    0

    If the ISS program were really going to be terminated in a few years (which until recently was the official plan) then investing in a large new facility like this would not be easy to justify. If the station is to be kept operating for a decade or two, or potentially indefinitely, than the rationale would be stronger. That said, small animal experiments are not precise analogs for humans for gravitational effects so dependant on body size and structure and voluntary activities like exercise. Extended human stays on the lunar surface might provide greater confidence that mitigation procedures are adequate for the slightly higher gravity on Mars.

    • kcowing says:
      0
      0

      Now we’ll never know since it is rotting in a parking lot in Japan.

    • Todd Austin says:
      0
      0

      Even if it means building from scratch, I expect that it would cost a whole lot less to construct and launch CAM that to create and sustain a lunar colony. CAM would, at least, give us some data to work with, perhaps provide some clues about issues that may arise. Right now we have nothing.