Astronaut Office Weighs In (Officially) On Ares/Orion/EELVs

Replacement for shuttle must serve as bridge craft, Steve Lindsey, Houston Chronicle

"NASA spent several years studying architectures and researching every available commercial rocket to find the design that could best accomplish those dual mission objectives in the safest, most reliable way. The conclusion we reached was that a space shuttle and Apollo derived vehicle was the best choice. Many have challenged this decision and still are advocating the use of existing commercial launch vehicles. Those have been studied extensively and fall short of our requirements for several reasons. First, existing commercial launch vehicles can lift only a fraction of the mass required for station and lunar missions in a single launch. Second, existing commercial launch vehicles have been designed and built to carry unmanned payloads; they would need to be heavily modified to meet our human rating requirements."

  • submit to reddit


SEOPS - Slingshot and Equalizer Cubesat Deployer
SpaceWorks QuickShot
Support SpaceRef, NASA Watch and the Astrobiology Web on Patreon.

Join our mailing list

Commercialization: Monthly Archives

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on December 20, 2008 1:59 PM.

Another Space Document Online at was the previous entry in this blog.

From The Earth to the Moon is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.