Desperate in Alabama

Sen. Shelby Asks NASA Inspector General To Investigate Augustine Commission Staff and Members

"I am writing with serious concerns regarding the Augustine Commission staff, their vocation, and their conduct while serving as Commission staff. It has come to my attention that several members are, in fact, federally registered lobbyists and that some of these individuals have taken direct advantage of their temporary roles on the Commission to further their personal business. Further, there are lobbyists that worked as Commission staff that are not even acknowledged in the report. This is both disturbing and unconscionable."

Keith's note: How curious. Between the sneaky tricks that Shelby's staff are playing behind the scenes with regard to companies and NASA field centers seens as threats to MSFC/Alabama/Ares to the non-stop outstretched hand of Shelby's contribution gravy train.

Have a look at this list of companies, PACs, etc. who have donated to Shelby's campaigns. See any familiar names? A potential for bias? Influence by lobbyists? Nah. Perish the thought. Sen. Shelby's campaign certainly does not have a problem taking financial contributions from companies - large and small - many of whom have a direct, substantial financial stake in the Ares 1 program and other programs that Shelby exerts influence over.

According to "Top 20 Contributors Senator Richard C Shelby 2005 - 2010" at Opensecrets.org, 5 out of the top 20 of Sen. Shelby's top contributors are Huntsville contractors.  Radiance technologies is particuarly dependent on Shelby for handouts and responded with $45,750 in contributions. Dynetics is only #19 with just $19,900 in donations.

As for the other local pols, according to "Top 20 Contributors Congressman Robert B Aderholt 2009 - 2010", Dynetics is his #1 contributor having written checks for $10,600 (where Dave King, Steve Cook etc. and other former senior MSFC management now work). And in the 5th Congressional District, incumbent Parker Griffith's (D) 2008 challenger Wayne Parker (R) got $22,300 from Dynetics making them his #1 contributor as well.

Huntsville's Revolving Door Spins Up (Dynaetics), earlier post

NASA Awards Alabama Information Technology Services Contract

"The total value of the contract, if all options are exercised, is approximately $335 million."

U.S. Richard Shelby calls for NASA investigation of the Augustine review panel, Huntsville Times

"To NASA critic Keith Cowing the move is duplicitous. "Does Sen. Shelby shun lobbyists?" asked Cowing, who runs the Web site NASAwatch.com. "This is like the pot calling the kettle black. If he has a problem with lobbyists then he should renounce them, give their money back and run on his own merits."

Congress, Obama face off on NASA, Orlando Sentinel

"That language, inserted by U.S. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., should pass this month as part of a nearly $450 billion omnibus appropriations bill. It would require NASA to spend nearly $4 billion on the program this fiscal year, effectively tying Obama's hands as he attempts to forge a new NASA policy that is likely to cancel Constellation's Ares I rocket. According to industry sources, U.S. Rep. Alan Mollohan, D-W.Va., also signed off on the language, at the urging of U.S. Reps. Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., and Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz. Mollohan heads the appropriations subcommittee that handles NASA, while Gordon and Giffords have oversight responsibility for the agency. "They are at an impasse," said space historian Roger Launius of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. "And unless the White House levels enough pressure, Congress could prevail." A checkmate is exactly what Shelby wants, as the veteran lawmaker has been a ceaseless protector of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama and its thousands of Constellation-related jobs."


Advertise Here

6 Comments

| Leave a comment

This does look pretty despicable. But as they say in Alabama, "He may be a snake, but he's our snake!"

Anybody know whether the IG is obligated to investigate just based on one senator's request?

It would seem more logical to wait for Obama to announce his plan and then attack that. But maybe Shelby calculated that it's better to buy some time by throwing a wrench in the works. Is it better now than 3 months ago, when the Commission's direction was clear but the report wasn't final?

Keith, I couldn't agree more. What a hypocritical jackass. I don't care if he is a Senator, he's a schmuck. There were also "government space" people involved in the Commission, so what. He just doesn't like the findings.

The political leaders who are pushing to maintain the present Constellation program are not serving their country at all well. They are clearly misinformed about the viability of the architecture, or are rationalizing their decisions based on short term parochial interests.

As an exploration architecture, the present one and half launch scenario has too many technical shortcomings. For any mission beyond LEO, all the in-space propulsion must be carried on the Ares V because the performance of the Ares I is so limited. For the lunar mission, that requires an Earth orbit rendezvous between the Lander, with the Earth departure stage, and Orion. During the subsequent trans-lunar injection and lunar-orbit insertion burns there are huge structural loads on the docking systems and undesired structural loads on the Lander. It also drives to a Lander that is monstrously huge, yet can not deliver much more than Apollo.

In addition, it requires two separate launch vehicle development efforts, two separate production lines, two launch processing flows, two launch teams, and additional launch pads. A dual heavy-lift launch with lunar orbit rendezvous is far superior and resolves the technical shortcomings of the present program of record. Only one launch vehicle development, production and processing flow would be needed.

The present Constellation program is an architecture that is seriously technically flawed, and does not close on performance or cost. It is simply unaffordable, and that is still true even if the addition funds suggested by the Augustine panel were provided.

This country does not need Ares I. This country needs dedicated heavy lift, beyond LEO. That is what our political leaders should be fighting for, rather than crippling the county’s future in space in order to serve their own special or uninformed interests.

I just want to remind folks that ULA's assembly plant in Decatur is only about 30 miles from MSFC and Shelby represents those folks as well. His actions are always characterized as trying to save MSFC while forsaking all others but I don't think that is necessarily true. He has both a commercial launch interest and a NASA field center in his back yard.

I am Stuned! Shocked !! And Appalled by the reactions here !!!

Surely Shelby is only doing what ANY politicians does these days and that to do the job he gets paid to do...in the left hand by taxpayers AND the right hand by lobbyists!

:)

The big difference is that the "Augustine Commission" was supposed to be an "Independent panel". Ya know that doesn't show bias. Last I check Senators are "supposed" to be biased.......To there constituents right.

Leave a comment




calendar

Events
Launches
Your Event

Monthly Archives

Mortgage Lead

Play online bingo at the top bingo sites.

Interested in Space Travel, try the next best thing, name your own star.

Video poker

Hier finden Sie die neuesten Casino Bonus Codes von fuhrenden Gaming-Sites.

Forex like a Pro with a leading forex broker.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on December 14, 2009 4:19 PM.

WISE Launch A Success was the previous entry in this blog.

Commercial Companies Are Against Commercial Space - Sort Of is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



- Find brilliant bingo sites and start to win

- Trade Forex like a Pro

- Die besten Seiten fur online roulette spielen, Spielstrategien und Tipps.