White House Was Against Bolden's China Trip Before They Were For It

U.S. China Statement, White House

"10.  The United States and China agreed to take specific actions to deepen dialogue and exchanges in the field of space.  The United States invited a Chinese delegation to visit NASA headquarters and other appropriate NASA facilities in 2011 to reciprocate for the productive visit of the U.S. NASA Administrator to China in 2010.  The two sides agreed to continue discussions on opportunities for practical future cooperation in the space arena, based on principles of transparency, reciprocity, and mutual benefit."

Keith's note: This is a little confusing. First, Bolden decides that he wants to go to China (and Indonesia and Vietnam) and the White House tries to talk him out of it saying that this is not the best time. Bolden then shortens his trip, and drops the Indonesia and Vietnam stops - but he still goes to China. A few days before his trip John Holdren leads a separate delegation to China (without Bolden). During after his trip, Bolden is absolutely silent about what happens on his trip and the White House continues to downplay it. Now, that trip shows up in this joint statement as a big accomplishment - with no mention of Holdren's trip. Is the White House trying to save face? Bolden still says nothing about his trip other than admitting that he went there. Is this "policy" development we're seeing, or just someone trying to make chaos look like it was planned all along?

Bolden's China Trip: Its His Idea, Not Obama's (Update), earlier post

Earlier China postings

4 Comments

| Leave a comment

I think this goes right along with what's going on with NASA and the US Economic outlook for the next few decades. The US is a falling empire and the China visit is an attempt to foster cooperation to prevent China from just flat out whipping America's ass in space.

This is especially true since the U.S. cancelled the Constellation program and thus will not have a human spaceflight program for the rest of this decade.

Charlie is the playing the sacrificial lamb role, he's going along with this ruse in promise of a nicer, more important job down the road.

Keith: I think your "chaos" theory is correct. Spaceflight is a highly visible way of marketing cooperation between the U.S. and China when, in reality, the cooperative possibilities are limited, especially with Human Space Flight. It's difficult to imagine the Chinese giving NASA managers and astronauts access to PLA space facilities in the same way that the Russians grant NASA access to Star City and Baikonur.

I sense a great deal of unhappiness with Mr. B in this forum. He leads the agency, the agency is having problems, he takes heat.

That said, I have noted moments where Mr. B has done some interesting things. I had never gotten so many post about what NASA is doing in my regular email. Many of you know so much more than I do. So for you, those posts are of small value. However those emails give me, a new guy, information I can share with regular folk to explain why NASA is still relevant, what it is doing, and why it is important.

SO Mr. B went to China. He gets panned, he is publicly chided. He is chided by the White House. He is skewered in this forum. Now, the President invites the head of China to the White House. The Nobel Peace Prize winner hosting the head of a country where there is a Nobel Peace Prize winner in prison. Now the White House needs help. What can then do. Well, Mr. B can tell them this is an opportunity to share technology. A visit to NASA centers, reciprocal to the one Mr B made, takes the spotlight off the difficult Nobel question. The White House has to be grateful to Mr. B.

Mr. B may be crazy, but he does seem to have some fox craziness. Just the observations of someone who knows little. From this little man perspective, Mr. B hasn't made the agency look bad at all.

Hurrah for General Bolden, as always the Marines lead the way when no else can. If we could engage on space for mutual safety and benefit of our human and robotic programs with the former Soviet Union, it would seem self evident that this could also be done with China, really having a far more successful capitalist economy than even that of modern Russia. The Soviet experience showed that we could engage on exchange of scientific data, on standards for interoperability of in-space rescue systems, and on sharing of remote sensing data for the general benefit of the planet without being overly paranoid about potential loss of sensitive technical data. Human rights are indeed important and no less so for Russia or China but engagement is the only path forward. When their or our astronauts need life-saving assistance in space, hopefully no one will be quibbling about politics, we will only be thankful that there was continuing engagement.

Leave a comment




calendar

Events
Launches
Your Event

Monthly Archives

Mortgage Lead

Play online bingo at the top bingo sites.

Interested in Space Travel, try the next best thing, name your own star.

Video poker

Hier finden Sie die neuesten Casino Bonus Codes von fuhrenden Gaming-Sites.

Forex like a Pro with a leading forex broker.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on January 20, 2011 8:20 AM.

Video: Dr. June Scobee Rodgers talking to Students on 25th Anniversary of Challenger was the previous entry in this blog.

Free Breakfast, Courtesy of Constellation is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



- Find brilliant bingo sites and start to win

- Trade Forex like a Pro

- Die besten Seiten fur online roulette spielen, Spielstrategien und Tipps.