This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Commercialization

Commercial Crew selection Announcement Status

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
September 10, 2014
Filed under ,

Keith’s note: Don’t expect to see a commercial crew selection announcement this week. Unless things change, of course.

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

26 responses to “Commercial Crew selection Announcement Status”

  1. AgingWatcher says:
    0
    0

    What is the hold-up, for heaven’s sake? The longer they delay the announcement, the more likely old cynics like me will begin suspecting back-room political intrigue.

    • jerry says:
      0
      0

      Hey Aging Watcher; I agree, Chicago politics at work

      • Vladislaw says:
        0
        0

        BS, if there is any politics it is with Senator Shelby and Alabama, Senator Nelson and Florida et cetera. It is the space states fighting about who is going to lose SLS . Orion as commercial crew comes online.

        • ed2291 says:
          0
          0

          Wherever the corruption is coming from, this does not look right.

        • jerry says:
          0
          0

          Most Floridians agree that sen. Nelson has done nothing for space except for lip service. this guy has been in office way too long.

          • Michael Spencer says:
            0
            0

            Perhaps true (I’m a Floridian, and a strong Democrat). But that other Senator? Worse.

            In truth Florida should OWN space launches. The geography trumps all and the opportunity has been squandered. And there are (were?) tens of thousands of very high skilled boys and girls available.

            Yea, I know about the Air Force. So what? A true leader would have dealt with those guys.

            It makes me crazy.

    • Anonymous says:
      0
      0

      My worst case… CCP: Boeing capsule, L-M rocket. SLS: L-M capsule, Boeing rocket. Nelson and Shelby all smiles. SpaceX cleans up commercial satellite market for the U.S. from rival nations and has CRS contract extended but Dragon V2 development put on hold/strung out without that federal funding. Either way, the Russian Soyuz still remains ISS crew transport till 2017 or 18.

    • Anonymous says:
      0
      0

      It is “customary as a matter of courtesy” (in fact it’s required) for NASA to delay public announcement of a major procurement until important players on Capitol Hill have been given a heads-up. Congressmen and Senators don’t like to be blindsided. The public announcement then follows in the next few hours, and often a day or two later.

      This gives time for the Congressional politicos and their cronies on Wall Street to exercise their insider trading. With buys and sells, puts and calls, there’s plenty of money to be made after the public announcement.

      I see this delay as being a good sign for SpaceX. I’m guessing that with that company being privately held, not publicly traded, the politicians and their masters are stumped. They’re probably putting pressure on SpaceX’s private investors to give them a piece of the action, but Elon and his friends are telling them to go push a rope. The delay is about money. It’s about politicians and Wall Street 1%ers trying to line their pockets.

      This procurement sets the momentum for MSF for years and possibly even decades to come. There’s a lot of money to be made.

      • Michael Spencer says:
        0
        0

        You are saying that the delay is so that insider trading can take place? Seriously? Any evidence of this?

        No? Thought so.

        It’s a corrosive attitude running through the country. We are shooting ourselves in the foot.

      • Vladislaw says:
        0
        0

        Sierra Nevada is privately held also. So if SpaceX and SNC are chosen there would not be any ‘calls’ there may be some ‘puts’ for Boeing, but they just landed the SLS core contract and it is a minor part of their revenue stream. Not many plays here unless there are some small, key, publically owned, sub contractors.

  2. Steven Rappolee says:
    0
    0

    well I would pick all of them at $800 million per year each……………………….

  3. Cincy says:
    0
    0

    As an item for conveying news, this ranks right up there with weather reports that advise that there’s a “50 percent chance of rain in your area.”

    • ed2291 says:
      0
      0

      True, but it is legitimate because this decision should have been made a long time ago. Perhaps Keith is trying to put pressure on NASA to make a decision. The longer this drags on the more it looks like bribery is involved – especially if Boeing gets it at the expense of Space X or Dreamchaser.

      • J C says:
        0
        0

        Keith *wishes* he had that kind of clout. If a decision is indeed imminent, then the source selection work has been done for a while and the announcement is just waiting for all the lawyers to agree on what the meaning of “is” is, in multiple places on several thousand pages. Then the announcement will go out and each of the losers’ lawyers will go through the same process to look for a loophole with which to file a protest. The legal fees alone for this could float a Third World country for several years.

  4. Mike Roetheli says:
    0
    0

    What is the delay?
    Hundreds, maybe thousands of people’s jobs are hanging on this
    announcement, and NASA just bumbles around continuing to delay, possibly
    causing “brain drain” from the companies because people aren’t sure
    when NASA will announce. This announcement was supposed to be made in
    August, and now we are left wondering if they will make the announcement in
    September. They aren’t fooling anyone, they already know who will be
    awarded the contract(s), this is bureaucratic nonsense. Co-locate your
    fecal matter, NASA, and make the announcement already.

    • jerry says:
      0
      0

      Hey Mike, you hit the nail on the head, this feet dragging is affecting a lot of people. But all them civil servants at KSC are still getting paid huh?

    • Hug Doug ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ says:
      0
      0

      it’s not an easy decision. many internet flame wars have been fought over this very topic.

  5. yg1968 says:
    0
    0

    I am guessing that NASA is waiting for the CR to be passed by Congress.

  6. Eric Berger says:
    0
    0

    Man, isn’t that the truth.

  7. Spacetech says:
    0
    0

    Sierra Nevada Corp has been flooding the job boards for the last 3 weeks with *contingent* job positions.

  8. J C says:
    0
    0

    I don’t know if they treat the big guys like the small contractors, but if they are true to form, the award will come on a Friday afternoon so everyone involved can high-tail it out of Dodge and not have to answer any questions until Monday.

  9. Joe Denison says:
    0
    0

    I am impatient too and I am really looking forward to it. I think the most likely explanation is that NASA is waiting for the CR or their appropriation bill to be passed depending on how Congress acts.

  10. Dennis Nesky says:
    0
    0

    It’s all politics. It won’t be SpaceX. No one wants to land with retrorockets like the Russians. It won’t be Boeing. They are way overweight and don’t need the money. The Dream Chaser that can land at any International airport is the only logical choice. Who wants to go back to a capsule? – Dennis

  11. Russell says:
    0
    0

    Guess: Is the delay because the President will announce the selection of winner(s), and getting time on his calendar right now is challenging to say the least?