This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Personnel News

Eric Trump's Brother-In-Law Is The New Deputy NASA Chief Of Staff. Seriously.

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
May 28, 2020
Eric Trump's Brother-In-Law Is The New Deputy NASA Chief Of Staff. Seriously.

Kyle Yunaska Named Deputy Chief of Staff At NASA Headquarters
“NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine has named Kyle Yunaska as the agency’s Deputy Chief of Staff. … Yunaska also served as the Principal Deputy Director and Chief of Staff for DOE’s Office of Policy and held several advisory roles throughout the Department. Prior to his work at DOE, Yunaska held a range of positions at various academic, nonprofit, and private sector organizations.”
Eric Trump’s brother-in-law gets promoted. E&E News (2017)
“Eric Trump’s brother-in-law is now chief of staff in a Department of Energy policy shop that was once tasked with carrying out President Obama’s climate change agenda, according to DOE’s online registry. Kyle Yunaska at DOE’s Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) may manage the front office operations and strategy and advise EPSA’s principal deputy director, Carol Battershell, and Executive Director Sean Cunningham, according to a description of the position on DOE’s website.”
Meet The Hottest Bachelors Of Washington D.C., Inside Edition
“Kyle Yunaska is an accounting manager for a non-profit. The 29-year-old is ready to settle down.”
Kyle Robert Yunaska, ProPublica

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

31 responses to “Eric Trump's Brother-In-Law Is The New Deputy NASA Chief Of Staff. Seriously.”

  1. mAm says:
    0
    0

    The first rule of ethics training is to avoid the appearance of impropriety. This is the opposite of that. Do better.

  2. David Fowler says:
    0
    0

    Only the best people.

  3. Michael Spencer says:
    0
    0

    I have gained an instinctual understanding of the phrase

    “I didn’t know whether to laugh, or to cry’.

    Other terms that have become visceral: disheartening, and dismay.

  4. Jeff2Space says:
    0
    0

    Nepotism.

  5. Ray Gedaly says:
    0
    0

    That solved the DOE’s problem.

  6. Daniel Roberts says:
    0
    0

    And what if he does succeed? You can’t say “Ahh nepotism! He will fail!” What if he doesn’t? Maybe he is the best one for the job. Maybe the first stage of rockets CAN return safely to the Earth too.

    • ed2291 says:
      0
      0

      Trump has tried many times people with no expertise who are supposed to outperform real experts through common sense. It has not turned out well.

      • Michael Spencer says:
        0
        0

        How do you hire people to fill positions you don’t understand? For jobs you just ‘know’ represent a flabby federal government?

    • sunman42 says:
      0
      0

      And the two things have as much to do with one another as floor wax and dessert toppings.

    • DJE51 says:
      0
      0

      You can certainly say, “Ah, nepotism!” in this case. It doesn’t matter if he does a good job or not, that is not what nepotism is about. It is about, how did he get the job? Did he go through the normal vetting process? Was there a talent search to fill that particular vacancy, and was he the best qualified? Or instead, did Bridenstine decide that it was in the best interests of NASA and his own position of influence to hire this POTUS family-connected person to a position that will not be particularly harmful if he is totally incompetent (which he probably isn’t), and may be beneficial to his own power base (otherwise known as brownie points with POTUS) so he can achieve what he wants to do. That is the essence of nepotism.

      • kcowing says:
        0
        0

        Bridenstine had no say in this. The White House told him that Kyle was coming over to NASA. He had no option except to say yes. This happens all the time with all Administrations.

        • cowboyabq says:
          0
          0

          Only so blatant in recent years. I was in DoD and DoE back in the days of GHW Bush and before. Yes, there were WH agents put in Schedule C jobs here and there to help assure nothing was done to embarrass the WH, but never in technically demanding posts. Higher executive posts, including any rank with the term ‘Secretary’ in the job title often went to people out of their depth, but their role was policy and the lower orders mapped out the technicalities of implementing the policy. It’s difficult to know how much Yunaska will interface with space scientists and really screw up.

    • Michael Spencer says:
      0
      0

      I hope he DOES succeed, as I do for the President.

  7. tutiger87 says:
    0
    0

    Grifters, all of them.

    I eagerly await the comments of the usual apologists.

  8. Ray Gedaly says:
    0
    0

    Quid Pro Quo

  9. jm67 says:
    0
    0

    No comment from Dr. Matula? MagaKen?

    • ThomasLMatula says:
      0
      0

      What is there to do a comment on other than it shows the importance President Trump puts on space to give his son’s brother-in-law the job. He could have put him at another less visible government agency. But it is still bad form to do so.

      • Michael Spencer says:
        0
        0

        Placing this guy at NASA is an indication of how important space is to the President – that’s how you see this? (I can’t see to find a cv)

  10. JennyBethsFrontButt says:
    0
    0

    We’re gonna need a bigger swamp

  11. Richard Brezinski says:
    0
    0

    Looks to me like he has a lot of positive experience over many years. Maybe it will help to have a direct line to the President? Together with Bridenstine maybe they can get us back to the Moon?

    • kcowing says:
      0
      0

      check the last link. Resume?

    • sunman42 says:
      0
      0

      Oh, you mean he’s meant as a mole to find out if anyone is letting reality seep into discussions of the likely earliest dates for new bootprints on the Moon — and rat on them to the Tweeter-in-Chief?

      • Richard Brezinski says:
        0
        0

        Maybe Trump is worried that his Administration went to great lengths to get Mr. Loverro engaged and then Loverro left after only six months. Seems like maybe someone needs to keep an eye on things.

        • the guy with the cat says:
          0
          0

          The eye is pointed in the wrong direction; they should look to themselves and not to NASA.

  12. sunman42 says:
    0
    0

    Ah, the old “Yes, but….” irrelevant comment.

    But I should correct that. The Politico hatchet piece does admit that, “Obama has hewed to a course reminiscent of his own political pedigree, a mix of Chicago and Harvard, where merit is a must but connections help, too.”

    Can you produce any evidence that Mr. Yunaska had many merit other than his relations by marriage?

  13. Mike Kyles says:
    0
    0

    Six degrees of separation throughout this entire crime syndicate of an administration.

  14. David Arias says:
    0
    0

    How much can be embezzled from the NASA budget?

  15. EMKAY says:
    0
    0

    Why can’t you folks get Obama out of your head? We all know DJT has done everything he can to destroy Obama’s legacy. The proof is in the pudding.