6 replies on “NASA Future In-Space Operations: Supersynchronous Earth Orbits for Lunar Missions”

  1. It’s kind of sad to see the Apollo spacecraft in that picture. NASA really likes that design, but it’s not 1961 any more. And, if Apollo’s CSM engine bell was way oversized since it was designed to lift the CSM off the Moon, what’s the excuse for this one?

    1. The large bell is to eke out every erg of rocket energy in a vacuum. In air pressure, the pressure keeps the flame from spreading so much and so the bell is smaller. The CSM was never landed on or taken off from the Moon. And, that’s not Apollo, but the very similar modern design being built these days. Though I agree with the sentiment “it’s not 1961 any more.”

    1. The dreamer in me still wants to see the orbiter stage look something like the nautilus-x design…

    2. I’m not excited about the long trip time through the radiation belts. For cargo, that’s not a problem. For people, it’s a real concern.

Comments are closed.