Keith’s update: see “Contractor Conversion: Two Things Can Be True At NASA” Keith’s note: I have been hearing of some concern at NASA KSC (and elsewhere around NASA too) about a perceived rush to convert core functions from contractors to civil servants. At a top level there is a certain logic to this. But when reality pops up it gets messy. One issue has to do with waiving education requirements to retain civil servant expertise. Again, this makes some sense – people who have been doing the job and doing it well should be allowed to continue regardless of where they got their experience. But when this is put in practice it is totally different. Some of the engineering folks at KSC have 10, 20, 30+ years of experience but are lacking college degrees. They are being told that this prevent or limits their ability to be converted from contractor to civil servant. At the Launch Equipment Test Facility (LETF) the younger contractor engineers with degrees were converted – but the ‘legacy’ (older) engineers were laid off – and with them a lot of space muscle memory went out the door. Update: this response from the NASA Administrator’s witter account was just tweeted. NASA PAO does not bother to contact me directly any more. I stand by my post. Apparently the full picture is not being communicated clearly at all levels and among affected employees at NASA KSC.
Biologist, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA Space Biologist and Payload integrator, Editor of NASAWatch.com and Astrobiology.com, Lapsed climber, Explorer, Synaesthete, Former Challenger Center board member... More by Keith Cowing

Many CS positions are term which I perceived as two-year stints, go through the bureaucracy then get laid off. Besides those that do direct work on launch vehicles and spacecraft, there are multitudes of people who work infrastructure whether it be HVAC techs, IT people, calibration people (both engineering and technician). Many of these get the message they are not wanted or the politics of NASA drives them (civil servant and contractor) to exit. I also think PAO is getting stretched thin and not given proper info on what can be shared and what cannot. Plus the PBR to reduce NASA funding to $18B sure doesn’t help in the big picture.