This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
TrumpSpace

NASA is already great. Right now.

By Keith Cowing
NASA Watch
June 4, 2025
Filed under , , , ,
NASA is already great. Right now.
Voyager

Keith’s note: I co-authored an opinion piece in the Houston Chronicle with Lisa Gray: Make America Great in Space Again? Pfft. Trump is wrecking what we already have.“When it comes to exploring the cosmos, the Trump administration’s quasi-official mantra is “Make America Great in Space Again.” But here’s the thing: NASA is already great. Right now.” More below.

NASA has sent missions to touch the sun, sent humans to another world, visited every planet in our solar system while discovering thousands of planets in other star systems, looked back to the dawn of time, and now has spaceships traversing interstellar space. No other nation even comes close to such an astonishing track record. And many people feel that we have only begun to realize the benefits of this half century of American leadership.

But instead of building on that capability, the White House seeks to gut virtually every aspect of space science and exploration wherein America has a multi-decade lead. This week, the disassembly of NASA was dialed up. On Friday, May 30, the White House released a budget that would cancel many missions and programs and see a reduction of one third — perhaps more — of the NASA/contractor workforce. The next day, the widely popular pick to be the NASA administrator was summarily un-nominated due to an internal White House food fight.

At roughly the same time, NASA also pulled out of the annual International Space Station Research and Development Conference, thus forcing its cancellation, and also announced that it will no longer provide overall funding for the annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston. Both were major gatherings, prime places for NASA to display its achievements to an international audience — which, besides spreading scientific knowledge, also functions to market U.S. space achievements to potential clients.

All of this happened against an administration policy meme of beating China in space. But instead of beefing up America’s space agency in all the places where China is advancing, the administration is cutting NASA off at the knees — thus handing that leadership to China and others by default.

This budget calls for the eventual retirement of the International Space Station (we all knew that was coming), with the idea being that low-Earth-orbit research will continue on an American commercial space station, or maybe more than one. Meanwhile, China is signing up customers for its space station — which it recently announced will be expanded.

Backing off of the China angle for a moment, let’s look at the layoffs that are about to descend upon NASA. Every NASA center faces across-the-board civil service personnel cuts of 25 to 30%, and the contractor workforce is likely to be hit even harder. You can argue the “too-many-cooks” point about efficiency, but that only goes so far. These cuts will remove capabilities that NASA needs to do its basic job — never mind the whole Let’s-Beat-China thing.

But wait, there’s more: The expertise that will be lost will stay lost for many years. When your plan is to reduce the workforce permanently, it’s hard to hire new, younger people. Soon the best place for young Americans to pursue a career in space may be outside America: Europe has already pounced on the chance to capture the brain drain from America’s space sector.

I am a child of the Apollo era. I grew up knowing that NASA could do anything it was chartered to do. Yes, in the past few decades there have been notable flops. But they are eclipsed by the astonishing things I mentioned above. Yes, NASA can and should do better. But it needs the tools and resources — and the people — to do so. But that is not what the White House is offering.

It’s true, SpaceX is doing amazing stuff in Texas. Blue Origin and many others have rushed in to advance American prowess in space, building upon initial work done by — you guessed it — NASA. But those companies have been built — and still depend — on work from NASA; developing private American companies with space know-how has been, and continues to be, a NASA goal. But cutting back NASA — slashing the space station without a firm plan for what comes next, and canceling dozens of future missions and payloads over the next decade — will cut demand for those private rocket launches, not increase it. And if the U.S. government doesn’t pay them, who will?

The baffling thing is that the Trump administration wants to enhance America’s global leadership in space and beat China, yet their ill-conceived tactics will achieve the exact opposite.

This is not the way for America to lead the way out into the cosmos. Hopefully Congress will wake up and notice. Let’s “Keep America Great In Space” — not abandon our lead.

Keith Cowing is the editor of NASAWatch.com.

NASA Watch founder, Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA, Away Teams, Journalist, Space & Astrobiology, Lapsed climber.

7 responses to “NASA is already great. Right now.”

  1. Colin Seftor says:
    0
    1

    Sigh…
    I know it’s not your thing. But it would be nice if, every so often (and especially in a post like this), you mentioned the vital role NASA has played (and continues to play) in Earth Science. NASA literally created the study of Earth from space and the use of earth monitoring satellites in weather forecasting and prediction. We are just on the threshold of developing and flying the next generation of earth monitoring system. Now the administration wants to gut NASA’s future programs (not to mention cut in half the science research currently being performed). It’s crazy given the fact that the ROI in this facet of NASA’s program is higher than all of the others. But crazy is what Trump et. al. specialize in.

    • Keith Cowing says:
      0
      0

      Dude. Have you ever heard about word count for publications? Or trying to make a simple straightforward point? I left out Moon, Mars, Orion, Astrophysics, Heliophysics Astrobiology, Space Biology aeronautics, AI, Technology, STEM education, HBCUs, SBIR, Next Gen Air Traffic control, nanotech, green fuels …. I was trying to make a simple point about the agency as whole – and you complain that your thing is not listed. You’re welcome. As for Earth science not being my thing – dunno where you get your facts but accusing me of not being interested in something – when I am – is not the most endearing way to get me to cover your thing. Go look at all the NOAA/NASA climate tweets I have made in the past months – and especially the last 24 hours.

  2. RocketSci says:
    1
    0

    One thing we need to articulate more is the economic impact of NASA, because sometimes that is all politicians will understand. In recent years, every $1 that went into the NASA budget generated $3 of economic impact. If you drill deeper into some of the missions, it’s even higher, like $20-40 to $1, especially the projects that result in technology spinoffs. As we speak, there is microgravity research being done on ISS that will improve performance and lower the cost of everything from medications to smartphone screen glass. I really don’t think the administration understands the impact of NASA, otherwise why would they cut the budget when it will create eveb deeper negative impacts on the U.S. economy.

    • Keith Cowing says:
      1
      0

      I – and others – have been saying this for at least the 40 years I have been in the DC space bubble.Totally agree: NASA needs to explain its importance and relevance to all people. NASA tries but has no idea who their audiences are or how to communicate with them. They try, nothing happens, they check off a box, and forget about it for 5 years until the next budget crisis. This administration is gutting Science everywhere across the government and is now reaching into academia. NASA is not alone. Tell the White House how important tNASA is – well. it’s pointless. – unless they can score some sound bite or gain some political capital with it.

  3. RT Humic says:
    1
    0

    Thanks Keith. Very well said. Publishing your essay in the Houston Chronicle was a bonus.
    There is this nice video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwmmPlw06_0 on the effect of the science cuts that should be amplified.
    Regards,
    RT

  4. Dave says:
    0
    0

    Keith, do you have any faith in Senator Cruz’s additional $10B he’d like to fund NASA? That would take overall budget to $28B which is even greater than the last couple of years. What can we do to support this?

    • Keith Cowing says:
      0
      0

      This is going to be rough since NASA is being ordered to go ahead and do things even without a final budget. People are going to be laid off and missions/programs shut down before this is all settled and then they will try and Brin things back but good luck with that. And I am an eternal optimist.

Leave a Reply