This is not a NASA Website. You might learn something. It's YOUR space agency. Get involved. Take it back. Make it work - for YOU.
Commercialization

SpaceX Successfully Launches Intelsat 35e

By Marc Boucher
NASA Watch
July 5, 2017
Filed under , ,

It was a case of the third time being the charm as SpaceX conducted its 10th launch this year. The Intelsat 35e has separated from the Falcon 9 second stage as expected and is in a good orbit.
Launch replay.

SpaceRef co-founder, entrepreneur, writer, podcaster, nature lover and deep thinker.

6 responses to “SpaceX Successfully Launches Intelsat 35e”

  1. Daniel Woodard says:
    0
    0

    Another smooth launch for SpaceX with the six metric ton 15-year life IS-35e, which separated on the target geostationary transfer orbit. When we have reached a point at which we are surprised that no attempt was made to recover the booster, we should recognize that we have come a long way.

  2. fcrary says:
    0
    0

    I’m glad everything went well. But the launch attempt on the 2nd had me worried. A failure would have been a new first in spaceflight. Two failures on the same day. (A Chinese CZ-5 failed to reach orbit.) I guess it is a sign of progress that the concept of two launches, let alone two failures, on the same day is imaginable. But I’m not looking forward to that first.

    • Michael Spencer says:
      0
      0

      When will launches no longer provide 10 minutes of terror, I wonder?

      With each launch comes the decreasing but measurable likelihood of catastrophic failure. It’s no wonder – the level of constrained energy, directed just ‘so’, will only increase as rockets grow ever larger. We’ve not seen the rocket equivalent of the A 380, for instance.

      Can we ever rely on rockets as we do aircraft? (Themselves containing huge amounts of chemical and kinetic energy).

      Will rockets ever shed the high probability of failure?

      • fcrary says:
        0
        0

        We might be spoiled by the standards of civil aviation. The fatal accident rate for aircraft is about one per two _million_ flights.

        But part of this isn’t the actual risk. It’s the appearance of risk. One airplane accident will get more news coverage than a hundred car accidents. One rocket going boom will get much more coverage than an airplane accident.

    • Daniel Woodard says:
      0
      0

      IMHO China will eventually realize that LH2 is not an efficient fuel for a core stage and move to a heavy (triple core) version of the CZ-7 for heavy lift instead.

  3. Chris says:
    0
    0

    Random space fact: So far SpaceX has had more launches this year (10) than either Russia or China (8 each).